Q20

 
alex.cheng.2012
Thanks Received: 8
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 28
Joined: May 02nd, 2013
 
 
 

Q20

by alex.cheng.2012 Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:57 am

I remember when reading through the last paragraph I was thinking "so does the author think countries should act unilaterally to curb emissions?" Lo and behold, it was one of the questions.

I got the question correct, but some input would still be much appreciated.

Incorrect Answers:
(A): I had some issues with this answer. Lines 51-54 indicate that countries would have less incentive to curb emissions and would probably emit more. The word that really stuck out to me was "probably." Would it be possible to argue that more emissions = harm? The passage never explicitly talks about harm, but it does talk about air pollution. One of the reasons I chose (C) was because I didn't remember explicitly seeing the discussion of harm.
(B): This one was fairly easy to eliminate. Line 46 straight up says benefits would spread across the globe.
(D): This one can be eliminated because it said the country's economy would benefit. If I recall correctly, no where does it link curbing emissions with economic benefit. In fact, upon review, line 29 talks about the possible taxing effect curbing emissions might have on the economy.
(E): This one was also fairly easy to eliminate. Inspired? The paragraph doesn't talk about inspiration.

Correct Answer (C): Line 47 talks about the cost. This was my biggest reason for choosing (C), since it's explicitly referred to in the passage. But when I read the question, and went back to read the relevant information, my pre-phrase (before reading the answers) was "not act unilaterally because other countries would have less incentive and would probably emit more emissions." When I saw that answer (C) didn't have that, I was thrown back a bit.
User avatar
 
tommywallach
Thanks Received: 468
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1041
Joined: August 11th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: Q20

by tommywallach Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:38 pm

Hey Alex,

Great work here. Just a little bit of simplification:

(A) The author says that other countries would benefit, not that they would be harmed.

(B) Again, the author said that other countries would benefit.

(C) CORRECT.

(D) The author is against acting unilaterally.

(E) The author is against acting unilaterally.

Tada!

-t
Tommy Wallach
Manhattan LSAT Instructor
twallach@manhattanprep.com
Image