by maryadkins Sat Aug 15, 2015 2:43 pm
Thanks for catching that! I'll move it over.
This question is about a passage in which the author has a CLEAR opinion about her topic—she thinks narrative ethics is good for medical students, better than abstract philosophical ethics. The entire second paragraph, supporting the last sentence of the first paragraph, supports this view. In particular, see line 27: "drawing on narrative literature can better help students prepare..." and the first sentence of the third paragraph, about narrative literature UNIQUELY suited to developing critical thinking. (A) is the best answer.
(E) makes it about intuition which the author explicitly says it's not in lines 47-50 ("It does NOT follow...in which decisions about ethical choices are made on the basis of intuition."
(B) is too narrow. It misses the whole point about narrative literature being a solution!
(C) misconstrues the author's opinion. That's not her point.
(D) leaves out the author having an opinion entirely!
Hope this helps!