Q22

 
llulucluci
Thanks Received: 0
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 1
Joined: September 13th, 2010
 
 
 

PT56, S4, Q22, "It can be inferred..."

by llulucluci Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:47 am

I was just wondering how we can infer that the 1880 legislators were concerned with improving educational equality across economic strata. I originally chose D, but I didn't think any of the answers were particularly appropriate. Thanks!
 
cyruswhittaker
Thanks Received: 107
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 246
Joined: August 11th, 2010
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
trophy
Most Thanked
trophy
First Responder
 

Re: PT56, S4, Q22, "It can be inferred..."

by cyruswhittaker Mon Oct 04, 2010 2:53 pm

I think the best support comes from lines 48-53, "Nearly a ..."

Underlying their justification (and hence their underlying beliefs/values) for reforms were the egalitarian visions of the past, leading them to bring such changes to fruition. This matches up with choice C.

D is unsupported because comparison of the level of political compromise between the legislators was not discussed explicitly, and it also wasn't referenced to in the passage as being a part of their beliefs.
User avatar
 
bbirdwell
Thanks Received: 864
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 803
Joined: April 16th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: PT56, S4, Q22, "It can be inferred..."

by bbirdwell Wed Oct 06, 2010 11:04 am

I agree with Cyrus. And in lines 20-26 we have support for how the earlier proposals regarded economic concerns: They wanted instruction to be available for everyone, and they wanted to the schools to be public.

The way to get a question like this right, as is the case for much of the reading comp, is to eliminate, eliminate, eliminate. Your dream answer just isn't going to be there much of the time. You know, essentially, that the legislators in question wanted an "egalitarian education," so eliminate all of the choices that don't come close to that, choose what's left over.
I host free online workshop/Q&A sessions called Zen and the Art of LSAT. You can find upcoming dates here: http://www.manhattanlsat.com/zen-and-the-art.cfm
 
zainrizvi
Thanks Received: 16
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 171
Joined: July 19th, 2011
 
 
trophy
First Responder
 

Re: Q22

by zainrizvi Sun Nov 13, 2011 1:01 pm

I don't understand how (A) is unsupported. Lines 49-53 say how they wanted to establish compulsory attendance for all students in secondary schools. This goes against the faults of the first proposal, which is stated in line 27-30 as being girls were required to leave at age eight in order to be educated at home in skills necessary for domestic life.

By extending secondary education, aren't they effectively going agaisnt skills necessary for domestic life?


Or is the error here "public school curriculum"? Because those domestic skills previously mentioned had nothing to do with the public school curriculum. Hence even if you remove those domestic life environment, you can't really make the inference that it has an impact on the public school curriculum. Maybe they had some other programs in the public school curriculum that they are maintaining.
User avatar
 
bbirdwell
Thanks Received: 864
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 803
Joined: April 16th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: Q22

by bbirdwell Tue Nov 15, 2011 12:14 pm

Or is the error here "public school curriculum"?


Yes. We have no idea whether the public school curriculum even included domestic skills, much less whether 1880s legislators were committed to removing them.
I host free online workshop/Q&A sessions called Zen and the Art of LSAT. You can find upcoming dates here: http://www.manhattanlsat.com/zen-and-the-art.cfm