Toggle navigation
SUPPORT
CONTACT US
STUDENT CENTER LOGIN
GMAT
GRE
LSAT
SAT
ACT
EA
TOEFL
gmat
gmat prep
prep options
free resources
instructors
admissions
blog
forums
store
gre
gre home
prep options
free resources
instructors
blog
store
lsat
lsat home
prep options
free resources
instructors
blog
forums
store
EA
About
our story
instructors
team
jobs
success stories
partnerships
blog
LSAT Forum
Register
Login
Search
Board index
Reading Comprehension
PrepTest 74 - December 2014 LSAT Answers & Explanations - RC
Passage #3 - Neuroscience, Determinism, and the Law
View unanswered posts
View active topics
Q24
Post a reply
2 posts
Page
1
of
1
b.lin.22.13
Thanks Received:
2
Vinny Gambini
Posts:
14
Joined:
September 15th, 2016
Q24
by
b.lin.22.13
Tue May 23, 2017 8:19 pm
Why is E wrong? It looks like it's directly supported by lines 46 - 50? My best guess is that since this is explicitly stated as something that Garcia argues, it's not something that Garcia assumes.
ohthatpatrick
Thanks Received:
3808
Atticus Finch
Posts:
4661
Joined:
April 01st, 2011
Re: Q24
by
ohthatpatrick
Fri May 26, 2017 2:47 pm
The passage says that the WWII rhetoric was "INCLUSIVE" (positive) while this answer choice calls the rhetoric "PATRONIZING" (negative).
Hope this helps.
Post a reply
2 posts
Page
1
of
1
Return to Passage #3 - Neuroscience, Determinism, and the Law