Convincing way? That’s where LSAT tricks us most of the time. We go to the AC with wrong mindset. Rather than looking for perfect AC, we should look the answer that is the best available answer.
Facts given:-
1. A company(produces men’s clogne) had been advertising the product in XYZ magazines for several years.
2. Then they started advertising that product in sports magazines with predominantly male readership.
Discrepancy- Despite the fact that a company advertised the product in magazine with predominantly male readership, they sold fewer bottles of that product than any of those previous years,
Assumption made by a company was that most of the buyers of that product were male. That’s why in the hope of increasing their sales they advertised the product in magazine with
predominantly male readership. This assumption is countered by AC D.
It’s possible that there could be flaws in right AC, but we are looking for the AC which most helps us to explain the discrepancy than the other ACs.
A-> Irrelevant.
B-> Irrelevant.
C-> For this AC, we have to assume that if men do not wear them, they do not buy them. Not necessarily. They can still buy them on regular basis.
D-> if women often buy the product to gift male friends or relatives then company’s stratergy doesn’t even matter. It’s true it may influence male readers to buy the product, but it atleat it gives reason to explain discrepancy as rather than influencing female buyers who often buy the product, company is focusing on male buyers.
Again, our task is to find best AC which is D.
E-> Irrelavent.
Hope that’d help!!