by ohthatpatrick Wed Oct 02, 2013 1:43 am
Yeah, this is a pretty close fight.
As you typed, the first paragraph is discussing differences between fruit flies, nematodes, and mammals in terms of polarity formation.
But (B) is talking about the differences in 'embryonic formation'. Polarity formation is definitely an aspect of polarity formation (you have to know your back from your front to form an embryo), but differences in 'embryonic formation' is definitely broader than the specific details/purpose of the second paragraph.
So that's already one way in which A beats B; A is more specific to the topic of establishing polarity.
The second big difference between them is whether to use the broader "organisms" or the more limited "fruit fly vs. nematode". Well, in both the first and second paragraph, the author brings up fruit flies, nematodes, and mammals, so (A) captures more of the truth by using the broader category.
We tend to fall in love with choices like (B) because "elaborate on the differences" is such a promising start to the answer. The test writers know this; they often pair up ideal 1st halves with broken/inaccurate 2nd halves. Meanwhile, the correct answer uses a phrasing we might not have anticipated.
So, long story short, what (B) says is true, but not the best answer to the question. Its topic is too general "embryonic vs. polarity formation" and its breadth is too narrow "fruit fly / nematode vs. various organisms".
Hope this helps.