Question Type:
Strengthen
Stimulus Breakdown:
Conclusion: People who quit their cigarette addiction are more likely motivated by social pressure than health concerns.
Evidence: People who break an addictive habit are more likely motivated by immediate concerns than long-term ones.
Answer Anticipation:
Pretty easy to pre-phrase here, given the parallel nature of the evidence and the conclusion. Apparently, the author is thinking that social pressure is more an immediate concern and health concerns are more long-term concerns. In fact, the author already tells us, within the conclusion, that social pressure is an immediate concern. So we're really just missing that health concerns are a long-term concern
Correct Answer:
B
Answer Choice Analysis:
(A) This goes more in a Weaken direction. Since we're talking about an addictive cigarette habit, it would potentially pose a great health risk, which sounds more like the opposite of the conclusion.
(B) Yes! This is close to our prephrase. It's not immediate, thus it's longer-term.
(C) This makes it sound like CONTINUING to smoke (exacerbating health concerns) would relieve social pressure. That doesn't match the author's conversation. She is saying it's more likely that social pressure would make you quit than that health concerns would.
(D) This answer does nothing to address the conclusion's distinction between social pressure and health concerns.
(E) No effect. We're trying to support the idea that "social pressure > health concern", and this is just saying "they're both relevant!"
Takeaway/Pattern: The symbol repetition of "____ is more likely to be X than Y" in both the Evidence and the Conclusion makes it easy to see which ideas are being equated in the author's mind. When you are reading a Strengthen question's stimulus and 'hear' a bridge idea, it's very likely that the correct answer will simply provide some support for / confirmation of that bridge idea.
#officialexplanation