mshinners
Thanks Received: 135
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 367
Joined: March 17th, 2014
Location: New York City
 
 
 

Q4 - The northern cardinal, a nonmigratory

by mshinners Fri Dec 31, 1999 8:00 pm

Question Type:
Weaken

Stimulus Breakdown:
Winter temps increased around the same time the northern cardinal started to appear in Nova Scotia. Therefore, the increase in temperature is the cause of the increase in bird population.

Answer Anticipation:
In general, the LSAT will weaken a correlation/causation argument by:
1) Providing an alternative cause
2) Providing a counterexample (cause without effect; effect without cause)
3) Bringing up reversed causality

The first is more common for earlier questions, so I'd head into the answers expecting an alternative cause. Also, the third possibility (increase in bird population caused an increase in temperature) makes no sense, so I wouldn't expect that.

Correct answer:
(A)

Answer choice analysis:
(A) Bingo. Alternative cause. The birds have feeders now, which caused them to increase in population. If you feed them, they will come.

(B) Out of scope. This answer choice is trying to get you to think that the increase in population is fake; the cardinal is easier to see, so it's easier to count. However, the survey was done both times on the same bird, so it would have been equally easy to see in 1980.

(C) Out of scope. This answer suggests something is causing an increase in bird populations, but it doesn't provide any alternative to the temperature increase.

(D) Too weak/unhelpful comparison. This answer is trying to get you to think that, since the nonmigratory bird (like the northern cardinal) populations fluctuated more than the migratory ones, the population numbers might be off. However, we just know that it fluctuated more, not that it fluctuated a lot. Since the comparison doesn't let us know if the numbers shifted enough to throw off the trend, this answer is wrong.

(E) Out of scope. If observations are showing an increase in population in spite of an increase in predation, then population really must have increased (to increase while also being hunted more). This answer, though, doesn't get at why it's happening.

Takeaway/Pattern: For early strengthen/weaken questions with a correlation/causation flaw, the correct answer will often deal with alternative causes.

#officialexplanation
 
HughM388
Thanks Received: 2
Elle Woods
Elle Woods
 
Posts: 54
Joined: July 05th, 2020
 
 
 

Re: Q4 - The northern cardinal, a nonmigratory

by HughM388 Tue Jun 01, 2021 12:29 pm

I'm not in love with (A), as it refers to bird feeders as a source of food for wintering birds, while the northern cardinal is described as nonmigratory; but it's the best of the lot.