riyazg754 Wrote:Ron,
In advanced varab and comparison section, Manhattan SC guide says that,
"a condition should be expressed by using If and use of inverted modal verb such as 'should' be avoided.
can you pls explain.
Riyaz
If the book says that, we should edit it. These constructions don't mean the same thing, so it's dangerous to generalize in this way.
The difference is not grammatical; it's a difference in the speaker's perception of the likelihood of the event.
- "If X happens..." portrays X as decently likely. It's not an extremely unlikely, remote, or outlandish possibility.
"- "If X should happen..." (= "Should X happen...") implies that X is quite unlikely.
That's basically the difference.
So, for instance, a good writer would be more likely to write "Should nuclear war break out tomorrow..." than to write "If nuclear war breaks out tomorrow..." (unless the writer actually believes that this is a decent possibility!)